Close Menu
    What's Hot

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    • Violent films have undesirable effect on society
    • High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » PROLONGED REFUSAL TO SEX IS CRUELTY
    Most Recent

    PROLONGED REFUSAL TO SEX IS CRUELTY

    Ground For Divorce
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Allahabad High Court has ruled that refusing sex to one’s spouse for an extended period without a valid reason amounts to mental cruelty and can be considered grounds for divorce.

    The decision came in response to an appeal filed by Varanasi resident Ravindra Pratap Yadav, who had sought a divorce on the grounds of mental cruelty inflicted by his wife’s refusal to cohabit and fulfill marital obligations. The court criticized the family court for dismissing Yadav’s plea and adopting a hyper technical approach.

    Yadav claimed that after their marriage in 1979, his wife’s behavior changed, leading to her refusal to live with him. They reached a divorce agreement in 1994, with Yadav paying an alimony of Rs 22,000. However, when he sought a divorce decree, his wife did not appear in court, resulting in the family court’s dismissal of his petition.    

    Allahabad High Court CRUELTY DIVORCE Divorce Agreement Hyper Technical Approach Marital Obligations Mental Cruelty REFUSAL TO SEX Spouse Refusal
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025

    Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days

    March 21, 2025

    Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness

    March 20, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (95)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    The Supreme Court has put on hold an Allahabad High Court ruling, strongly condemning its…

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version