Close Menu
    What's Hot

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    • Violent films have undesirable effect on society
    • High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » DOUBLE TROUBLE
    Most Recent

    DOUBLE TROUBLE

    The Mystifying Cases of Criminal Twins Who Slipped Through the Cracks
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    In the world of identical twins, a peculiar challenge arises for law enforcement. These twins, sharing all of their genes and most of their identifying marks, often find themselves tangled in a web of mistaken identity. Imagine a scenario where one twin commits a crime and cunningly places the blame on the other. The evidence may be overwhelming, and numerous witnesses may attest to their guilt, but the authorities face an extraordinary predicament when it comes to distinguishing between these nearly indistinguishable individuals.

    During trials, the judges and jury find themselves perplexed, unable to confidently discern which twin is the true perpetrator. The conventional methods of identification fall short in these extraordinary cases. These identical twins, also known as monozygotic twins, originate from the fertilisation of a single egg that later splits into two. Their genetic makeup is virtually identical, and they share nearly all physical traits, including being of the same sex.

    In a world where fingerprints act as unique identifiers, these twins would be an unstoppable force if their prints were different. However, despite their shared genes, their fingerprints exhibit slight variations, providing a glimmer of hope for law enforcement. Thanks to modern technology, the police now rely on fingerprint analysis to differentiate between identical twins, making it the sole means of reining in their criminal activities. Nevertheless, there have been numerous highly debated cases where identical twins managed to evade justice and walk free after committing serious crimes. The inability to definitively assign guilt to a specific twin leaves the courts in a frustrating position. As these cases continue to captivate public attention, society grapples with the challenge of balancing the rights and responsibilities of these strikingly similar individuals who share an uncanny bond.  

    IN A world where criminal twins seemed to have the upper hand, justice has finally caught up with them. Thanks to the ingenious technique known as “high resolution melt curve analysis” (HRMA), these mischievous twins can no longer outwit forensic investigators. The game of deception just got a lot less identical, and the scales of justice have tilted in favour of truth. Although HRMA is not without its limitations, this breakthrough paves the way for a practical and accessible test that will revolutionize forensic casework involving twins. With this hurdle overcome, DNA profiling solidifies its place as an indispensable tool, fortifying the accuracy and reliability of criminal justice systems around the globe. The days of twin trickery are numbered, and the world is a safer place for it. 

    Satish & Sabarish

    Malaysia, 2003:

    Identical twins, Satish-Sabarish, arrested for drug trafficking. Both faced the death penalty. Police couldn’t identify the true culprit. Both acquitted. Media reports confirm the twin brothers escaped execution as the court couldn’t prove who committed the crime. The judge cited their indistinguishable features, calling it a “unique case.”

    Hassan & Abbas

    Germany, 2009

    Identical twins Hassan and Abbas were arrested in Germany in 2009 for a multi-million dollar jewelry heist. Despite abundant evidence, the police couldn’t determine the real culprit between the brothers. Eventually, both twins were acquitted due to the difficulty in distinguishing  them during the trial.

    Charles & George

    US, 1952

    During WWII, Charles and George Finn served in the US Army Air Corps. George instructed while Charles piloted B-17s. In 1952, they bought a C-46 plane from a district school for their airline. When the government halted the purchase, one brother hid it in the Nevada desert. The FBI found it, but no one could identify who out of twins hid it, so they weren’t prosecuted.

    Albert Ebenezer Fox & Ebenezer Albert Fox

    England, 1857

    Known as the Twin Foxes, exploited their resemblance to challenge English authorities and seek recompense for wrongful convictions. They amassed a staggering 150 poaching convictions. Their case shed light on the unique nature of fingerprints, proving their value in identifying  individuals as distinguished twins.

    Orlando & Brandon Nembhard

    USA, 2011

    In a nightclub altercation, Sir Xavier Brooks was fatally shot. Based on visual testimony, Orlando Nembhard was arrested for the murder, but complications arose as police discovered  his identical twin, Brandon. As the murder weapon was missing, there was no conclusion regarding fingerprints and DNA, thus visual identification by witnesses proved unreliable.  The case remains inconclusive, leaving the shooter unknown.

    Patric & James

    England, 2016

    Patrick Hennessy, of Cheltenham was arrested for possessing illegal weapon and driving dangerously but he blamed his identical twins James for the same. DNA tests failed to determine which brother was responsible, leading to their acquittal. Prosecutors couldn’t provide evidence to disprove the claim that one brother’s twin was the real offender, resulting in not guilty verdicts for both.

    Jerome & Tyrone Cooper

    Michigan, 1999

    Identical twin brothers were suspect of a sexual assault case in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The victim’s DNA matched Jerome’s, who was already in prison, but authorities discovered Tyrone’s existence. The challenge was in determining guilt as they are identical twins with matching DNA.

    JUDICIAL JUMBLE
    BULLDOZE THE JUDICIAL TRUST
    AADHI AABADI ADHURA HAQ
    Shouting ‘Mara Mara’ Doesn’t Prove Intent to Kill: Bombay High Court
    acquittal acquitted courtroom challenges crime criminal justice criminal twins DNA DNA profiling fingerprint analysis forensic investigation high resolution melt curve analysis (HRMA) identical twins inconclusive evidence indistinguishable features Justice System law enforcement matching DNA mistaken identity monozygotic twins Technology TROUBLE twin trickery Twins unique case victim visual identification witnesses
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025

    Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days

    March 21, 2025

    Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness

    March 20, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (95)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    The Supreme Court has put on hold an Allahabad High Court ruling, strongly condemning its…

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version