Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    • Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » ONLY A CLEAR YES MEANS YES
    Featured

    ONLY A CLEAR YES MEANS YES

    FROM BOLLYWOOD 'PINK' TO BOMBAY- DELHI HIGH COURT
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    In 2016 Bollywood Movie “Pink” shook the audience with its powerful message that when a woman says no, it means no, regardless of her profession or social status. Meanwhile, Delhi HC made it clear that a woman’s consent to be in a man’s company cannot be used to infer her agreement to Sexual Liaison. And Bombay HC ruled that a drunk woman’s yes is not a yes at all
    Pink Movie Poster

    BOLLYWOOD HAS always been known for its love stories, drama, and song and dance routines. However, with time, the Indian film industry has come of age and has started to experiment with various themes. Bollywood has produced a series of films with a range of themes, but none quite like 2016 movie ‘Pink’, directed by Shoojit Sircar and Aniruddha Roy Chowdhury. Pink tackles the reolutionary and age old concept that women are always willing to have sex with men. The film portrays three modern working girls in Delhi, who befriend a couple of wealthy boys and go to a private resort, where a string of events unfolds. This leads to an attempted rape, and one of the girls defends herself, almost killing the boy. 

    The boy is the son of an influential leader, and a case is fabricated against the girl. She is charged with attempted murder, and the police further fabricate evidence against her, bringing out the bizarre notion that a woman who drinks and has male friends must be either a call girl or a woman with loose character.

    ALSO READ

    DOUBLE TROUBLE – The Mystifying Cases of Criminal Twins Who Slipped Through the Cracks

    “Amitabh Bachchan stars as a Lawyer who skillfully defends the girl and turns in a powerful performance.Amitabh Bachchan delivers a remarkable portrayal of a lawyer in the film, expertly defending a young girl and delivering a commanding performance. With ease, he dismantles all the claims put forward by the public prosecutor, ultimately securing the girl’s acquittal. Bachchan’s character successfully communicates the powerful message that a woman should not be judged for her dress or behavior, as it does not reflect her sexual promiscuity. In addition, he boldly challenges the global stereotype that a woman who dresses freely and indulges in laughter and drinking is easily attainable. The film addresses the age-old concept that a woman is always ‘willing’ and sends a strong message that when a woman says no, it means no, regardless of whether she is a prostitute, girlfriend, or housewife.

    The movie’s theme has gained even more significance with recent court rulings in India.  In a recent verdict by the Delhi High Court which reiterated an important message that a woman’s agreement to be in a man’s presence does not imply her consent for a sexual relationship. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, presiding over a single-judge bench, emphasised that it is incorrect to assume that a woman who consents to being with a man, irrespective of the duration, has also agreed to have sexual relations with him. “A distinction also needs to be articulated between a prosecutrix consenting to a situation versus consenting to sexual liaison.” Similarly, Bombay High Court recently ruled that when a woman is intoxicated, she is incapable of giving free and conscious consent to a sexual relationship. Hence, a drunk woman’s yes is not always a yes. The message is clear – consent to company is not consent to sex.

    In a world where women are constantly judged based on their dress and behavior, it is essential to understand that women are not objects for male gratification. Women are independent human beings with their own agency, and it is important to respect their boundaries and consent. The recent court rulings and the film Pink serve as a reminder that it is time to change age-old concepts and attitudes towards women.

    In conclusion, the movie “Pink” may have been released in 2016, but its message shall always stand relevant. It is heartening to see that the Indian judiciary is also recognising the importance of consent and making rulings to protect women. It is high time that we understand that a person’s behaviour or circumstances cannot be used to assume consent. Only a clear “yes” means “yes.”      

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    LAWYER
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Love to the Point of Endangerment

    September 30, 2024

    A Second Chance at Love

    July 29, 2024

    A Patriotic Story of Love, Sacrifice, and Reform

    July 18, 2024

    It’s back to school time for lawyers and justice

    July 2, 2024

    PAWS ON PAVEMENT

    April 15, 2024

    PRIVACY, POLICE, AND GOOGLE SEARCHES

    March 11, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (2)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (97)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    In a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim…

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version