A Canadian court has ruled that a thumbs-up emoji can be considered a binding agreement in a legal contract.
The case involved a dispute between a farmer and a grain buyer over the sale of flax. The farmer responded to a text message containing a photo of the signed contract with a thumbs-up emoji, which the buyer believed signified agreement. This decision reflects the evolving nature of communication, where emojis play a role even in serious business transactions.
The case revolved around a dispute between a farmer in Saskatchewan and a grain buyer over the sale of 87 metric tonnes of flax in 2021. The buyer had sent a text message containing a photo of the signed contract to the farmer, who responded with a thumbs-up emoji. While the farmer, Chris Achter, argued that the emoji merely confirmed receipt of the contract, the grain buyer, Kent Mickleborough, believed it signified agreement to the contract based on his accompanying text requesting confirmation.
Justice T.J. Keene, in his ruling, referenced the definition of the thumbs-up emoji from dictionary.com, which describes it as a symbol expressing assent, approval, or encouragement in digital communications. Keene admitted his limited expertise in technology but found this definition aligned with his understanding of everyday usage.
However, Achter’s lawyer cautioned that considering a thumbs-up emoji as agreement to a contract could open the floodgates to a range of cases seeking to define the meaning of other emojis. Laura Little, a law professor, referred to the decision as a significant indication of the modern communication landscape, where an emoji can unexpectedly solidify a contractual commitment.
We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism.
But we can’t do it alone.
Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.