Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    • Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » SUPREME COURT UNLEASHES PLAN FOR KERALA’S STRAY DOG CONUNDRUM
    riteBOL

    SUPREME COURT UNLEASHES PLAN FOR KERALA’S STRAY DOG CONUNDRUM

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Kannur district panchayat has filed an intervening application in court, seeking permission to humanely euthanize dogs that are suspected to be rabid or extremely dangerous.
    The Supreme Court sought a response from the Animal Welfare Board on applications, including the one by KSCPCR. 

    The Supreme Court of India has issued a notice on a fresh intervention application filed by the Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (KSCPCR), seeking relief for children from stray dogs in the state. A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and KV Viswanathan asked nodal counsel Manisha Karia to file a compilation of all applications along with the relief sought within two weeks.

    During the hearing, the counsel for the Kerala Panchayat expressed concern over the increasing number of stray dog attacks on humans, particularly school children. In response, the counsel for the respondents argued that Kerala is not adhering to animal birth control measures and emphasized the need for a well-structured and long-lasting solution to the issue.

    ALSO READ

    KERALA HIGH COURT RULES: NO HELMET, NOT AN EXCUSE EVEN FOR THE ILL

    The Supreme Court sought a response from the Animal Welfare Board on applications, including the one by KSCPCR. The counsel appearing for Anjali Gopalan, a member of the Animal Welfare Board, told the bench that the state is killing dogs by entering people’s homes, which she said cannot be allowed.

    Appearing on behalf of the Animal Welfare Board of India, Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra informed the court that the board has already drafted rules that could serve as a reference for the case. The hearing has been scheduled to continue on August 16th.

    The plea by KSCPCR stated that it is essential for the safety of children and public welfare that all stray dogs be caught and kept in a safe place. According to the petition, there has been a significant increase in stray dog attacks in recent years, with 11,776 cases reported in 2022 alone.

    The court was hearing an intervening application filed by the Kannur district panchayat, which has sought permission to euthanize suspected rabid dogs or extremely dangerous dogs in a humane manner. In their plea, they cited the case of an 11-year-old autistic child who was mauled to death by a pack of stray dogs in Kannur on June 11.

    The Supreme Court is already seized of a petition filed by the Animal Welfare Board of India, challenging a 2006 judgment of the Kerala High Court which empowered local self-government institutions to kill stray dogs. The petition was filed in response to the Kerala government’s decision to cull stray dogs after a series of dog attacks on people in 2015.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    AnimalWelfare Kerala StrayDogs SupremeCourt
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Violent films have undesirable effect on society

    March 19, 2025

    High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams

    March 19, 2025

    BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory

    October 18, 2024

    Bombay HC Orders Rs 4.2 Lakh Compensation After Man Suffers in Jail for No Reason

    October 18, 2024

    Asking for a Name and Number Isn’t Sexual Harassment, Says Gujarat HC

    July 19, 2024

    Mere Interrogation does not Justify Arrest, Kejriwal granted bail

    July 12, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (2)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (97)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    In a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim…

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version