Close Menu
    What's Hot

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    • Violent films have undesirable effect on society
    • High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » TAKE HALF OF MY SALARY
    New Arrivals

    TAKE HALF OF MY SALARY

    - Justice Narasimha
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    In a surprising turn of events, Supreme Court Judge, Justice P S Narasimha, made a unique proposition to lawyers. He has expressed his displeasure with being addressed as ‘My Lord’ or ‘Your Lordships’ during legal proceedings and offered to give half of his salary to any senior advocate if he refrains from using these terms. Instead, he suggests that lawyers can use ‘Sir’ and has stated that he will keep a count of how many times the senior counsel says ‘My Lords’.

    This practice of addressing judges as ‘My Lord’ or ‘Your Lordship’ is seen by some as a remnant of the colonial era and a symbol of slavery. The Bar Council of India had passed a resolution in 2006 to end this practice, but it was not implemented. CJI H.L. Dattu, in 2014 had stated that addressing judges as ‘Your Lordship’ was not required, while hearing a PIL filed by counsel Shiv Sagar Tiwari, who challenged the practice as a symbol of ‘slavery’.

    ALSO READ

    THE CASE OF CRICKET CELEBRATIONS

    In a similar, the Kerala High Court has observed that a petitioner woman had a constitutional right to argue her case before the court. She was not required to plead with tears and folded hands, as judges are not Gods. Justice Kunhikrishnan stated that even though a court of law is known as a temple of justice, there are no Gods on the bench requiring any obeisance from lawyers or litigants apart from maintenance of decorum.

    While some argue that this practice is a matter of tradition and respect, others contend that it is a sign of subservience and inferiority. The question remains whether changing the mode of address will have any impact on the quality and independence of the judiciary, or whether it is merely a cosmetic change that does not address the deeper problems of the legal system.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    Subscribe Us 

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    Bar Council Justice P S Narasimha Kerala High Court My Lord slavery Supreme Court Your Lordships
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    Violent films have undesirable effect on society

    March 19, 2025

    High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams

    March 19, 2025

    Bombay High Court Clears Gautam Adani in Rs 388 crore Market Violation Case

    March 17, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (95)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    The Supreme Court has put on hold an Allahabad High Court ruling, strongly condemning its…

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version