Close Menu
    What's Hot

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    • Violent films have undesirable effect on society
    • High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » DIGITAL DEFAMATION
    New Arrivals

    DIGITAL DEFAMATION

    YouTuber’s Wallet Lighter by Rs 50 Lakh in Defamation Suit
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    In an era where the internet is a double-edged sword, the Madras High Court has delivered a verdict that could serve as a precedent for online conduct. Justice N Sathish Kumar has ordered YouTuber Joe Michael Praveen to pay a hefty sum of Rs 50 lakh to trans person entrepreneur and AIADMK party spokesperson, Apsara Reddy.

    The court’s decision comes in the wake of defamatory content posted by Praveen on YouTube, which had a detrimental impact on Reddy’s character, behaviour, and personal life. The judge observed that such statements, devoid of any semblance of truth, are not only objectionable and malicious but also infringe upon the privacy of individuals.

    ALSO READ

    INDIA’S CYBERCRIME CRISIS

    The verdict underscores the fact that the right to post on YouTube does not grant one the liberty to cross boundaries and encroach upon others’ privacy. The judge further noted that the libellous videos led to the cancellation of some of Reddy’s programmes.

    While damages cannot be claimed, the court deemed it necessary to compensate Reddy with at least Rs 50 lakh. The judge also urged Google to exercise vigilance in the future to prevent the hosting of such malicious content.

    This case serves as a stark reminder of the potential harm that can be inflicted through digital platforms. It underscores the need for responsible online behaviour and the importance of respecting the privacy and dignity of individuals. As the saying goes, “With great power comes great responsibility,” and this is especially true in the digital age.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    Subscribe Us 

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    DIGITAL DEFAMATION Madras High Court YouTuber
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Violent films have undesirable effect on society

    March 19, 2025

    High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams

    March 19, 2025

    Madras High Court quashes sexual harassment charges, says teenage affection isn’t a crime

    November 16, 2024

    BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory

    October 18, 2024

    Bombay HC Orders Rs 4.2 Lakh Compensation After Man Suffers in Jail for No Reason

    October 18, 2024

    Asking for a Name and Number Isn’t Sexual Harassment, Says Gujarat HC

    July 19, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (95)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    The Supreme Court has put on hold an Allahabad High Court ruling, strongly condemning its…

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version