Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    • Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » JUDICIAL JUMBLE
    New Arrivals

    JUDICIAL JUMBLE

    When Personal Beliefs Clash with Constitutional Duties
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    In a week that has seen the Indian judiciary make headlines for all the wrong reasons, two incidents stand out. The first involves Justice Pankaj Jain of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, who made homophobic remarks in open court, sparking widespread condemnation. The second incident involves the Supreme Court criticising a judgment by the Calcutta High Court that advised adolescent girls to suppress their sexual urges.

    Justice Jain’s remarks, made in response to a case involving a same-sex couple, were not only offensive but also in stark contrast to the 2018 Supreme Court verdict that decriminalised homosexuality and affirmed the rights of the LGBT community. His assertion that “constitutionality and morality are different” has ignited a debate about the role of personal beliefs in judicial proceedings.

    ALSO READ

    HIT-AND-RUN? THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT!

    On the other hand, the Calcutta High Court’s advice to adolescent girls to suppress their sexual urges was deemed “highly objectionable and completely unwarranted” by the Supreme Court. The apex court rightly pointed out that such remarks violated the rights of adolescents under Article 21 of the Constitution.

    These incidents highlight the need for the judiciary to uphold the rights and interests of all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or age. They also underscore the importance of separating personal beliefs from judicial duties. After all, the rule of nature and respecting the autonomy of the body should be placed far above personal morality or a written code. As the guardians of justice, judges must remember that their words carry weight and can have far-reaching implications. Let’s hope these incidents serve as a reminder of the need for sensitivity and respect in the courtroom.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    Subscribe Us 

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    decriminalised homosexuality judicial proceedings Judiciary
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Violent films have undesirable effect on society

    March 19, 2025

    High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams

    March 19, 2025

    BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory

    October 18, 2024

    Bombay HC Orders Rs 4.2 Lakh Compensation After Man Suffers in Jail for No Reason

    October 18, 2024

    Asking for a Name and Number Isn’t Sexual Harassment, Says Gujarat HC

    July 19, 2024

    Mere Interrogation does not Justify Arrest, Kejriwal granted bail

    July 12, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (2)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (97)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    In a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim…

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version