Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    • Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Supreme Court Justice Gavai Highlights Judicial Discipline and Efficiency Concerns
    Featured

    Supreme Court Justice Gavai Highlights Judicial Discipline and Efficiency Concerns

    BCI Announces Big Change
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    During the eastern zone judicial conference at the National Judicial Academy in Kolkata, Supreme Court Justice Bhushan R Gavai made startling observations about certain practices among high court judges that he finds concerning. Justice Gavai, who is part of the Supreme Court Collegium responsible for selecting judges, criticized several aspects of judicial conduct that he believes undermine the dignity and efficiency of the judiciary.

    He highlighted instances where some high court judges reportedly work for only one hour daily, despite the stipulated six hours of judicial work. Justice Gavai expressed shock over delays in court proceedings, noting instances where judges arrive late and leave early, significantly reducing their court time. He emphasized the importance of judicial punctuality and adherence to designated court hours to maintain the credibility of the judicial process.

    Addressing behavioral issues, Justice Gavai condemned instances of judges mistreating lawyers, stating that such behavior diminishes the dignity of the judicial institution. He stressed the equal partnership between judges and lawyers in administering justice and cautioned against any conduct that undermines this partnership.

    Another area of concern Justice Gavai highlighted was the arbitrary summoning of government officials by judges, which he criticized as disruptive to administrative duties unless absolutely necessary. He urged judges to exercise restraint and considerate judgment when issuing such directives.

    ALSO READ

    GRAVE MATTER

    Regarding judicial discipline, Justice Gavai cautioned against judges making decisions that contradict established legal precedents, emphasizing that such actions harm the reputation and integrity of the judiciary. He underscored the importance of maintaining judicial fraternity and discipline to uphold the sanctity of legal judgments.

    In a candid reflection on judicial appointments, Justice Gavai expressed dismay over judges lobbying for elevation to the Supreme Court, noting that such actions undermine the merit-based selection process of the Collegium. He emphasized the need for judges to focus on their judicial duties and uphold discipline rather than engage in lobbying activities.

    Turning to the judicial process itself, Justice Gavai urged judges to deliver judgments promptly and in clear, understandable language for litigants. He stressed the judiciary’s role in maintaining impartiality and remaining unaffected by external influences, including social media commentary and public sentiment.

    On the broader issue of cooperative federalism, Justice Gavai acknowledged the challenges and conflicts inherent in the distribution of powers between the Union and the States. He highlighted the judiciary’s pivotal role in resolving these conflicts in accordance with constitutional principles, ensuring harmony and effective governance across the country.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    HIGH COURT JUDGES Justice Gavai National Judicial Academy Supreme Court
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (2)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (97)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    In a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim…

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version