1.0Legal Mitrahttps://legalmitra.comKhushboo Sharmarich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="nRGv8DHDi3"><a href="https://legalmitra.com/index.php/2023/06/22/adulterers-right-to-privacy/">ADULTERER’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY </a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://legalmitra.com/index.php/2023/06/22/adulterers-right-to-privacy/embed/#?secret=nRGv8DHDi3" width="600" height="338" title="“ADULTERER’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY ” — Legal Mitra" data-secret="nRGv8DHDi3" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://legalmitra.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js </script> https://legalmitra.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/980x-1502538303.jpg700467DELHI HC has rejected the claim of a man accused of adultery by his wife, stating that the right to privacy is not absolute. The court ruled in favor of the wife, who sought evidence to support her divorce case. The court ordered a hotel to produce records related to the accused’s stay with another