Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?
    • Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences
    • Right to Marry Is a Human Right
    • DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH
    • RITUALS BEFORE REGISTRATION MATTER
    • THE DIGITAL ARREST
    • LOVE IN THE AGE OF AI
    • when TREES become CITIZENS
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Supreme Court Justice Gavai Highlights Judicial Discipline and Efficiency Concerns
    Featured

    Supreme Court Justice Gavai Highlights Judicial Discipline and Efficiency Concerns

    BCI Announces Big Change
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    During the eastern zone judicial conference at the National Judicial Academy in Kolkata, Supreme Court Justice Bhushan R Gavai made startling observations about certain practices among high court judges that he finds concerning. Justice Gavai, who is part of the Supreme Court Collegium responsible for selecting judges, criticized several aspects of judicial conduct that he believes undermine the dignity and efficiency of the judiciary.

    He highlighted instances where some high court judges reportedly work for only one hour daily, despite the stipulated six hours of judicial work. Justice Gavai expressed shock over delays in court proceedings, noting instances where judges arrive late and leave early, significantly reducing their court time. He emphasized the importance of judicial punctuality and adherence to designated court hours to maintain the credibility of the judicial process.

    Addressing behavioral issues, Justice Gavai condemned instances of judges mistreating lawyers, stating that such behavior diminishes the dignity of the judicial institution. He stressed the equal partnership between judges and lawyers in administering justice and cautioned against any conduct that undermines this partnership.

    Another area of concern Justice Gavai highlighted was the arbitrary summoning of government officials by judges, which he criticized as disruptive to administrative duties unless absolutely necessary. He urged judges to exercise restraint and considerate judgment when issuing such directives.

    ALSO READ

    GRAVE MATTER

    Regarding judicial discipline, Justice Gavai cautioned against judges making decisions that contradict established legal precedents, emphasizing that such actions harm the reputation and integrity of the judiciary. He underscored the importance of maintaining judicial fraternity and discipline to uphold the sanctity of legal judgments.

    In a candid reflection on judicial appointments, Justice Gavai expressed dismay over judges lobbying for elevation to the Supreme Court, noting that such actions undermine the merit-based selection process of the Collegium. He emphasized the need for judges to focus on their judicial duties and uphold discipline rather than engage in lobbying activities.

    Turning to the judicial process itself, Justice Gavai urged judges to deliver judgments promptly and in clear, understandable language for litigants. He stressed the judiciary’s role in maintaining impartiality and remaining unaffected by external influences, including social media commentary and public sentiment.

    On the broader issue of cooperative federalism, Justice Gavai acknowledged the challenges and conflicts inherent in the distribution of powers between the Union and the States. He highlighted the judiciary’s pivotal role in resolving these conflicts in accordance with constitutional principles, ensuring harmony and effective governance across the country.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    HIGH COURT JUDGES Justice Gavai National Judicial Academy Supreme Court
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026

    HC Orders Immediate Steps to Save Sonam Wangchuk’s Life

    July 16, 2026

    ‘Mahaprabhu Jagannath’ Makers Move SC Against HC Ban Ahead of Release

    July 16, 2026

    SC Stays Madras HC’s Blanket Ban on Cow Slaughter in Tamil Nadu

    July 16, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (22)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Digital Classics (3)
    • Editorial (7)
    • Featured (61)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • Feb-March 2026 (3)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (4)
    • International (14)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (38)
    • June 2025 (7)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • June-July 2026 (7)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (15)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (44)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (146)
    • New Arrivals (69)
    • News (60)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • Oct-Nov 2025 (10)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (97)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (26)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    The Supreme Court has raised a larger constitutional question over whether the statutory right to…

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026

    DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH

    July 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Our Picks

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2026 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version