Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    • Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory
    Featured

    BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Support for young legal professionals gets a lift, but financial constraints may limit adoption

    To ease the financial crisis of junior lawyers, the BCI has come forward with the proposal of introducing stipends in an organized manner. Stipends up to ₹20,000 per month in urban or ₹15,000 per month in rural could be provided for newly enrolled advocates working under senior lawyers in law firms and standalone practitioners in relief.

    The following proposal follows a directive by the Delhi High Court and reiterates calls from the Madras High Court for financial relief to junior advocates. While the program suggests that stipends be paid for as long as three years, the BCI has clarified that it is of the voluntary nature rather than compulsory, owing to the financial constraints some of the senior practitioners may possess.

    ALSO READ

    Asking for a Name and Number Isn’t Sexual Harassment, Says Gujarat HC

    The BCI emphasizes the role of mentorship and hands-on experience in the careers of junior lawyers, and therefore it is promoting formal arrangement between senior and junior members to have more feasible terms of engagements and support towards expenses. Although stipend is not compulsorily prescribed, the BCI takes care of balanced support among junior advocates through constant monitoring and periodical review.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    Citizen's Rights citizens citizenship Supreme Court
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (2)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (97)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    In a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim…

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023160 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    June 12, 2025

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    June 10, 2025

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version