Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?
    • Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences
    • Right to Marry Is a Human Right
    • DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH
    • RITUALS BEFORE REGISTRATION MATTER
    • THE DIGITAL ARREST
    • LOVE IN THE AGE OF AI
    • when TREES become CITIZENS
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    Featured

    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant

    Mumbai Consumer Court to Complainants
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg RestaurantIn a quirky consumer dispute, the Mumbai Consumer Court dismissed a ₹6 lakh compensation claim filed by two self-declared vegetarians who alleged they were wrongly served non-veg momos. 

    The Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission rejected a complaint filed by two people who claimed to have been served non-vegetarian food when they were staunch vegetarians. The commission noted that if eating non-vegetarian food injures one’s religious sentiments, then such persons should ideally not order from restaurants that serve vegetarian as well as non-vegetarian food.

    The complainants had ordered a steamed ‘Darjeeling momo combo’ and a soft drink at a momo stall in Sion, Mumbai. They said they had mentioned their vegetarian option twice while ordering. But when it was delivered to them, they allegedly got chicken momos, which gave them mental trauma and caused emotional distress. They sought a compensation of ₹6 lakh on grounds of hurting their religious sentiments.

    ALSO READ

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    The restaurant, however, responded that the complainants themselves had requested non-vegetarian dishes, as indicated in the bill. The complainants were also accused by the company of abusing employees verbally and physically, causing disruptions at the outlet. The restaurant went ahead and returned the order, gave the products free of charge, and even offered a 1,200 gift card as a gesture of goodwill. The company also claimed that the demand for ₹6 lakh compensation was made in malafide intent to harass.

    Analyzing the evidence, the commission observed that the display board may not have served to clearly mention whether the Darjeeling momo combo was veg or non-veg but stated “veg/non-veg” options at the bottom. Further, the complainants have not presented any evidence of religious ceremonies which were claimed to have been disturbed.

    Stressing personal responsibility, the commission said, “A sensible person would be able to differentiate between veg and non-veg food prior to consuming.” It held that no lack of service by the company was proven and rejected the complaint.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    Consumer Court Non-Vegetarian Ingredient Restaurant
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026

    HC Orders Immediate Steps to Save Sonam Wangchuk’s Life

    July 16, 2026

    ‘Mahaprabhu Jagannath’ Makers Move SC Against HC Ban Ahead of Release

    July 16, 2026

    SC Stays Madras HC’s Blanket Ban on Cow Slaughter in Tamil Nadu

    July 16, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (22)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Digital Classics (3)
    • Editorial (7)
    • Featured (61)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • Feb-March 2026 (3)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (4)
    • International (14)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (38)
    • June 2025 (7)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • June-July 2026 (7)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (15)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (44)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (146)
    • New Arrivals (69)
    • News (60)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • Oct-Nov 2025 (10)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (97)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (26)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    The Supreme Court has raised a larger constitutional question over whether the statutory right to…

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026

    DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH

    July 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Our Picks

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2026 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version