Close Menu
    What's Hot

    From Catwalk to Courtroom: Prada’s Kolhapuri Catwalk Faces Legal Strut

    July 4, 2025

    ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown

    July 3, 2025

    A Day’s Delay Is Dignity Denied

    July 3, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • From Catwalk to Courtroom: Prada’s Kolhapuri Catwalk Faces Legal Strut
    • ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown
    • A Day’s Delay Is Dignity Denied
    • Bengaluru May Be Alluring, But Transfers Are Inevitable
    • Women Bear the Brunt in Live-In Breakups, Says Allahabad High Court
    • Charity Shouldn’t Be a Crime”: Madras High Court Slams ‘Suspicion Culture’ Over Foreign-Funded NGOs
    • Wife’s WhatsApp Chats Can Be Used as Evidence of Affair, Even if Accessed Without Consent
    • Hurt by Non-Veg? Then Why Order from a Non-Veg Restaurant
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Wife’s WhatsApp Chats Can Be Used as Evidence of Affair, Even if Accessed Without Consent
    Featured

    Wife’s WhatsApp Chats Can Be Used as Evidence of Affair, Even if Accessed Without Consent

    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Wife’s WhatsApp Chats Can Be Used as Evidence of Affair, Even if Accessed Without ConsentIn an important decision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a wife’s WhatsApp chats, even if accessed by her husband without her consent, can be tendered as evidence in divorce proceedings to prove charges of adultery.

    The court noted that by Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, family courts are allowed to consider any material that can help settle disputes even if the material in question would not be admissible normally under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The judgment held that a husband can place such chats before courts to substantiate allegations of extramarital affairs or cruelty.

    ALSO READ

    Registered But Not Owned? Supreme Court Drops a Legal Bombshell

    In the present case, the husband had pulled out his wife’s personal WhatsApp messages through a tracking application secretly installed in her phone. The chats purportedly unearthed an extramarital affair with some other man. Relying on the same, he has filed for divorce on charges of cruelty and adultery.

    The legal team representing the wife objected to the filing of the chats on grounds that it represented a violation of her right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution and contravened sections of the Information Technology Act—Sections 43, 66, and 72.

    Overruling these objections, the High Court declared that although the right to privacy is certainly a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right that can never be overridden in the cause of justice. The court relied on past Supreme Court decisions to support its stand that privacy rights are open to reasonable restrictions, especially when balanced against the right to a fair trial.

    But the court entrusted the matter to the discretion of the family court to decide whether or not to depend on the WhatsApp messages as credible evidence in the ultimate verdict.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    Consumer Court Non-Vegetarian Ingredient Restaurant
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    From Catwalk to Courtroom: Prada’s Kolhapuri Catwalk Faces Legal Strut

    July 4, 2025

    ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown

    July 3, 2025

    A Day’s Delay Is Dignity Denied

    July 3, 2025

    Bengaluru May Be Alluring, But Transfers Are Inevitable

    June 27, 2025

    Women Bear the Brunt in Live-In Breakups, Says Allahabad High Court

    June 27, 2025

    Charity Shouldn’t Be a Crime”: Madras High Court Slams ‘Suspicion Culture’ Over Foreign-Funded NGOs

    June 27, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023166 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023152 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023105 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June 2025 (7)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (104)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (58)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    From Catwalk to Courtroom: Prada’s Kolhapuri Catwalk Faces Legal Strut

    Prada’s ₹1.2 lakh Kolhapuri-inspired sandals have triggered a legal storm in the Bombay High Court,…

    ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown

    July 3, 2025

    A Day’s Delay Is Dignity Denied

    July 3, 2025

    Bengaluru May Be Alluring, But Transfers Are Inevitable

    June 27, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023166 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023152 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023105 Views
    Our Picks

    From Catwalk to Courtroom: Prada’s Kolhapuri Catwalk Faces Legal Strut

    July 4, 2025

    ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown

    July 3, 2025

    A Day’s Delay Is Dignity Denied

    July 3, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version