Close Menu
    What's Hot

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order
    • Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?
    • No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court
    • X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content
    • Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days
    • Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness
    • Violent films have undesirable effect on society
    • High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Plea Filed in Madras High Court Challenges Hindi Names of New Criminal Laws
    Featured

    Plea Filed in Madras High Court Challenges Hindi Names of New Criminal Laws

    BCI Announces Big Change
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A petition has been filed in the Madras High Court seeking to declare the Hindi names of the new criminal laws—Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023—as unconstitutional. The plea, submitted by Lawyer Ramkumar Adityan, argues that these names violate the Constitution, the Official Language Act of 1963, and the Tamil Nadu Official Language Act of 1956.

    Adityan’s petition calls for the Cabinet Secretariat, the Home Secretary, and the Law Secretary to take appropriate steps to provide English nomenclature for these new laws. He contends that the Union Government’s decision to assign Hindi and Sanskrit names to the new criminal laws is problematic, considering that only 9 states and 2 union territories out of the 28 states and 8 union territories in India have Hindi as their official language. Moreover, Hindi is not the mother tongue of 56.37% of Indians, yet the new laws have been named in Hindi and Sanskrit.

    The petitioner argues that this decision creates confusion, ambiguity, and difficulty for law students, law teachers, advocates, law officers, judicial officers, and the general public who are not familiar with Hindi and Sanskrit. He asserts that this violates the fundamental right of non-Hindi-speaking people to practice their professions without undue hindrance.

    ALSO READ

    Supreme Court Justice Gavai Highlights Judicial Discipline and Efficiency Concerns

    Adityan further argues that Article 348(1)(a) of the Constitution mandates that all proceedings in the Supreme Court and the High Courts be conducted in English. He highlights that the legislative intent behind Article 348 was to ensure uniformity and accessibility, as English is widely spoken and understood across India, transcending regional and linguistic barriers.

    Using English in court, he says, ensures effective communication among litigants and legal professionals from different parts of the country. Additionally, it facilitates access to legal knowledge, as most legal precedents and literature are in English, and reduces the likelihood of misinterpretation or misunderstanding.

    Adityan also notes that according to Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Official Language Act of 1956, Tamil and English are the official languages in Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the new Hindi names violate the state’s language laws.

    End

    READ NEXT

    Subscribe Us 

    Facebook Twitter Youtube

    We strive to make a lasting impact on India’s policy and planning landscape through fair, unbiased, and incisive research based journalism. 
    But we can’t do it alone.
    Together, we can create a better India, where policies are fair, planning is unbiased, and the truth prevails. Your contribution matters, and we shall be immensely grateful for your support.

    Support LegalMitra
    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Constitution Madras High Court
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025

    Delhi High Court Directs Bar council of india to Enroll Korean Attorney in Two Days

    March 21, 2025

    Maintenance Law Seeks Equality, Not Idleness

    March 20, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (21)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Editorial (5)
    • Featured (44)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (3)
    • International (7)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (37)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (14)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (43)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (95)
    • New Arrivals (63)
    • News (57)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (95)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (25)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    The Supreme Court has put on hold an Allahabad High Court ruling, strongly condemning its…

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025

    X Sues Centre Over Alleged Misuse of IT Act to Block Content

    March 22, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023150 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023148 Views

    BETTING A HIGH-STAKES DEBATE

    June 21, 2023104 Views
    Our Picks

    SC Slams Allahabad HC’s “Insensitive” Rape Remarks, Stays Order

    March 26, 2025

    Education Behind Bars: A Progressive Move or a Risky Precedent?

    March 22, 2025

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version