Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?
    • Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences
    • Right to Marry Is a Human Right
    • DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH
    • RITUALS BEFORE REGISTRATION MATTER
    • THE DIGITAL ARREST
    • LOVE IN THE AGE OF AI
    • when TREES become CITIZENS
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Demo
    • Home
    • Editorials
    • Articles Category
      • Law Focus
      • Law to Life
      • Law Tech
      • Cover Story
      • HOUMOUR
      • Legal Desk
      • International
      • Matrimony
      • Women
      • Cyber Crime
    • Magazine Issues
    • Authors
    Legal MitraLegal Mitra
    Home » News » Lawyer face sanctions for ChatGPT made up citations
    News

    Lawyer face sanctions for ChatGPT made up citations

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Lawyer Steven A. Schwartz is facing potential penalties after using the AI ChatGPT to fabricate citations and opinions in a brief. The Manhattan judge, of Federal District Court, ordered a hearing in response to lawyer’s  acknowledgment of using the AI for his research. Schwartz expressed surprise at ChatGPT’s ability to generate seemingly authentic case citations and judicial opinions. He explained that he had discovered ChatGPT through his college aged children and various articles, but had never utilised it professionally. The incident has attracted significant media attention and sub-jected Schwartz and his law firm, Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, to public ridicule. The judge will determine whether sanctions are warranted for Schwartz’s conduct.  

    AI Research Authenticity Brief Case Citations ChatGPT Fabricated Citations Federal District Court hearing Judicial Opinions LAWYER Manhattan Judge Opinions Sanctions Surprise
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH

    July 17, 2026

    RITUALS BEFORE REGISTRATION MATTER

    July 17, 2026

    ‘Tom, Dick and Harry’ Jibe Heats Up X vs India Legal Showdown Over Content Takedown

    July 3, 2025

    Violent films have undesirable effect on society

    March 19, 2025

    High Court Saves Student Kids from Fear in Exams

    March 19, 2025

    BCI Proposes Stipend Boost for Junior Lawyers, But Not Mandatory

    October 18, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Categories
    • Agastya Sharma (2)
    • August 2023 (19)
    • August 2024 (7)
    • Cover Story (22)
    • Cyber Crime (3)
    • Digital Classics (3)
    • Editorial (7)
    • Featured (61)
    • Featured Videos (3)
    • Feb-March 2024 (23)
    • Feb-March 2026 (3)
    • February 2024 (2)
    • Gadgets (1)
    • HOUMOUR (4)
    • International (14)
    • January 2024 (27)
    • June – July 2024 (38)
    • June 2025 (7)
    • June-2023 (10)
    • June-July 2026 (7)
    • Khushboo Sharma (2)
    • Latest in Tech (3)
    • Law Focus (15)
    • Law Medics (2)
    • Law Tech (8)
    • Law to Life (44)
    • Legal Desk (6)
    • Legal Mitra – E Magazine (1)
    • Maarisha Sharma (1)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • May-2023 (16)
    • Most Recent (146)
    • New Arrivals (69)
    • News (60)
    • November 2024 (6)
    • Oct-Nov 2025 (10)
    • October 2023 (8)
    • October 2024 (9)
    • riteBOL (97)
    • Ritesh Sharma, Editor (26)
    • Shipra Sharma (3)
    • Tech & Work (1)
    • Todays Picks (1)
    • Trending (6)
    • Uncategorized (5)
    • Women (8)
    Don't Miss

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    The Supreme Court has raised a larger constitutional question over whether the statutory right to…

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026

    DOG EVIDENCE NOT ENOUGH

    July 17, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Most Popular

    No Maintenance for Working Wife, Rules Supreme Court

    March 22, 2025344 Views

    The Fasli Year

    July 13, 2023272 Views

    HANUMAN’S JOURNEY OF GUIDANCE

    June 24, 2023165 Views
    Our Picks

    Right to Work: Fundamental Right or Constitutional Aspiration?

    August 21, 2026

    Police Cannot Investigate PCPNDT Act Offences

    August 21, 2026

    Right to Marry Is a Human Right

    August 21, 2026
    Legal Mitra
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • About Legal Mitra
    • Editorials
    • Article Categories
    • Contact Us
    © 2026 Legal Mitra. Designed by CREADIG.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version